
Matt Warshaw, former editor of Surfer Magazine, wrote an article for the New York Times about how he thinks Slater should "do the thing that virtually every other sports legend, from Ali to Armstrong, has been unable to do. Go out on top." He has the mentality that a "perfect" 10 is "perfect" for a reason and Slater should retire as a successful surfer.
In contrast, Chas Smith believes that because Slater is so talented, even beautiful, that he should never retire from professional surfing.
I've never been a huge fan on debates on what an athlete should do for their career. Its hard to believe that an athlete would choose the desires of the public over his own, making this discussion pointless. The only people that should care are the ones competing against Slater. But what they want probably won't be in the best interest of a competitor that continuously claims all the glory and cash prizes from contests.
Right now he still is competing and I don't think he's going to stop in the near future. One thing Slater has in common with other great athletes like Michael Jordan for example is his unwillingness to quit. Just like Jordan, he retired and came back because great athletes have a personality that won't let them quit. Just look at Brett Favre, a great quarterback who held on until the very end of his career.
This no quit attitude is very inspiring and even though it might be nice to see an athlete retire while he is still on top, I don't think its possible. Slater's personality won't allow it.
I don't think Slater will retire from the World Tour until he can no longer perform at the same level he is performing today. And if he does he will most likely return like many others before him have done.